ESG Investing: Pros, Cons, and How to Comply (2024)

ESG investing is a type of investing that considers environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when making investment decisions. ESG factors include, amongst others, things like a company's carbon emissions, labor practices, and board diversity. For several years now, investors have been seeking investments that align with their morals and values - and ESG investments began with the intent to do just that. Unfortunately, the investment industry set out to create niche products that were not truly incorporating these aspects into portfolio creation. Fund managers set out to do what is common to them - provide investors with solutions that generate revenue (for the managers) and provide returns (for their investors). Because of this, regulators have stepped in not only to provide guidance and direction, but also to monitor fund managers to ensure they are complying with the requirements in labeling an investment as an ESG investment.

There are many pros to ESG investing. First, it can help investors align their investments with their values. For example, investors who are concerned about climate change may choose to invest in companies that are working to reduce their carbon footprint. Second, ESG investing can help investors manage risk. By considering not only financial performance, but also ESG factors, investors can identify potential risks that may not be apparent from financial data alone; for example, the risk of a factory being located on a site which may be increasingly susceptible to flooding. Third, ESG investing has proven to have a positive impact on the environment and society. For example, a study by the Global Impact Investing Network found that impact investments outperformed traditional investments by 3.2% per year over a 10-year period.

However, there are also some cons to ESG investing. First, ESG funds may carry higher-than-average expense ratios. This is because ESG investing requires more research and due diligence, which can be costly. Second, ESG investing can be subjective. There is no one definition of what constitutes an ESG investment, and different investors may have different criteria. This can make it difficult for investors to compare ESG funds and ensure that they are investing in a fund that is truly aligned with their values. Lastly, there is the risk of greenwashing, which is when a company or fund makes false or misleading claims about its ESG credentials.

Here are some specific ESG factors that investors may want to monitor:

  • Environmental factors: a company's carbon emissions, water usage, and waste disposal practices
  • Social factors: a company's labor practices, human rights record, and commitment to diversity and inclusion
  • Governance factors:a company's board composition, executive compensation and incentive structure, and internal controls

Investors can monitor ESG factors by using a variety of methods and resources, including:

  • Self-reporting:Companies are often required to self-report their ESG performance to regulators. This can be done through a variety of methods, such as filing a report, completing a questionnaire, or participating in an audit.

Recommended next reads

ESG Investing: Investing for the Future Jordan Landers 4 years ago
ESG Investing Defined – A Beginner's Guide Michael Reynolds, CFP® 10 months ago
ESG Investing: A Promising Trend or Overhyped Fad? Raj Sukkersudha 1 year ago

  • Third-party verification:Regulators may also require companies to have their ESG performance verified by a third party. This can be done by an independent auditor, a ratings agency, or another organization that specializes in ESG compliance.
  • ESG data providers:There are several ESG data providers that collect and aggregate ESG data from companies. This data can be used by regulators to monitor ESG compliance and to identify companies that are not meeting the requirements.
  • ESG ratings:ESG ratings are a way to assess a company's ESG performance. These ratings are often used by investors and other stakeholders to make decisions about where to invest their money.

The specific method used to monitor and evidence ESG regulatory requirements will vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific requirements. However, the methods described above are some of the most common approaches.

Of course, monitoring a new type of investing comes with its challenges, including:

  • Lack of standardization:There is no single, universally accepted definition of ESG. This can make it difficult to compare companies' ESG performance and to assess their compliance with regulatory requirements.
  • Data availability:ESG data can be difficult to obtain and expensive to collect. This can make it difficult for companies to comply with ESG regulatory requirements.
  • Greenwashing:There is a risk of greenwashing, which can make it difficult for investors and other stakeholders to know which companies are in fact committed to ESG.

On top of these challenges, regulators have shown that they are not afraid to impose massive fines against firms who improperly categorizing themselves as ESG:

  • Goldman Sachs: In 2022, Goldman was fined $4 million by the SEC for misleading investors about the ESG credentials of its funds.
  • BNY Mellon: In 2022, BNY Mellon was fined $1.5 million by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for misstatements and omissions related to ESG.
  • Deutsche Bank: In 2023, Deutsche is expecting to pay a fine of $30 million by the SEC for violations to mismanagement of ESG funds.

These fines are a reminder that ESG investing is a complex and evolving field. Investors should be careful to do their research and to choose ESG funds that are truly aligned with their values.

Despite these challenges, ESG is becoming increasingly important to investors, regulators, and other stakeholders. As a result, we can expect to see more innovative methods developed to monitor and evidence ESG regulatory requirements in the future.

In the meantime, firms should consider providers or solutions that will help in vetting through the requirements. As these requirements continue to evolve, the use of proper data points and accurate analytics will help in mitigating issues with regulators. Firms should also continue to have forward thinking in the monitoring of these items. As we continue to see the development and usage of AI, I envision working through these issues much more quickly and efficiently in the future.

ESG Investing: Pros, Cons, and How to Comply (2024)

FAQs

What are the negatives of ESG investing? ›

However, there are also some cons to ESG investing. First, ESG funds may carry higher-than-average expense ratios. This is because ESG investing requires more research and due diligence, which can be costly. Second, ESG investing can be subjective.

What are the pros and cons of ESG criteria? ›

While there are some disadvantages to ESG criteria, such as limited disclosure and subjective evaluation, the advantages of promoting environmental sustainability, social responsibility, positive brand image, and lower risk cannot be overlooked.

What are the flaws of ESG investing? ›

Some ESG data can be useful in certain circ*mstances, but an over reliance on simplistic ESG scores can be a dangerous strategy, especially when using them to build investment portfolios. Relying too heavily on ESG scores is also unlikely to help reorient capital towards more sustainable companies.

What is the controversy with ESG investing? ›

Critics portrayed ESG investing as primarily motivated by political concerns and a potential drag on returns. Additionally, some critics have raised concerns about the complexity and reliability of ESG metrics.

Why are companies against ESG? ›

For some, the rise of ESG funds is a threat. They don't want to see the world use the leverage of finance and reporting to address shared challenges; it would reduce their power.

Who is against ESG investing? ›

“Republicans and aligned groups are vehemently opposed to ESG,” says Poreda. “They view ESG as a subversive way to enact political and ideological goals through investing.

Why do investors prefer ESG? ›

Investors increasingly believe companies that perform well on ESG are less risky, better positioned for the long term and better prepared for uncertainty. Companies that realign to the stakeholder capitalism agenda may have a competitive advantage over those that try to return to business as usual.

Does ESG actually matter? ›

According to a study by MSCI, companies with high ESG ratings had better financial performance than those with lower ESG ratings, with a 35% higher return on equity and a 20% higher valuation.

Do ESG investments perform better? ›

In some cases, ESG has outperformed, while in others, it has underperformed. Figuring out whether ESG stocks outperform the broader market is difficult for a few reasons. For one, there isn't a central authority that can decide whether a business follows ESG practices.

Is ESG greenwashing? ›

ESG disclosure mandates & standards likely to spur rise in greenwashing claims in 2024 & beyond. Claims of greenwashing — allegations of fraud related to environmental, social & governance (ESG) matters involving misconduct or misstatements — will emerge more prominently in 2024.

What is the biggest ESG scandal? ›

In December 2022, Florida announced that it was taking $2 billion out of the management of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager (and biggest lightning rod for ESG criticism). This was the largest such divestment thus far. These attacks have been coordinated.

What is the backlash against ESG? ›

With accusations of “greenhushing,” “greenwashing,” and “woke capitalism,” the three letters “ESG” have become synonymous with backlash. The rhetoric is simple if one wishes to undermine economic decisions that encourage ethical behavior as a primary concern.

Why is the ESG backlash? ›

The backlash against ESG investing and climate-focused regulations has increasingly spread to Europe, once a leader in ESG regulations. Widespread protests by farmers throughout the EU have been spurred, in part, by sustainability-related protocols that have increased operating costs and reduced profit margins.

What is the negative impact of ESG on companies? ›

The researchers' findings indicate that when companies focus on nonmaterial ESG factors in their quarterly financial updates, investors interpret it as a negative sign, signaling potential issues like higher costs, inefficient resource use, and distracted management.

Why is ESG a risk? ›

ESG Risks are those arising from Environmental, Social and Governance factors that a company must address and manage. These risks are a combination of threats and opportunities that can have a significant impact on an organisation's reputation and financial performance.

Do investors really care about ESG? ›

Retail investors do care a lot about the ESG-related activities of the firms they invest in, but only to the extent that they impact firm performance, independent of ESG performance.

Is it worth it to invest in ESG funds? ›

The research showed that overall, sustainable funds have consistently shown a lower downside risk than traditional funds. And while some ESG funds are relatively new (particularly many passive ones), they've been able to show solid performance and resiliency in both good markets and bad.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 5529

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.