The anti-ESG backlash is not just an American phenomenon as Europe waters down its sustainability agenda (2024)

A wave of discontent over sustainability policies is sweeping across the Atlantic, making green growth harder and putting the leaders and financiers who are fighting to implement environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies under pressure. And the upcoming U.S. election will not make life any easier for the companies that are navigating the powerful currents of anti-ESG lobbies.

In Europe, the ardor for ESG regulations has somewhat cooled. The strong polarization around ESG criteria has not waited for the result of the U.S. election. It is lurking in the undertones of financial and standardization talks. The dynamism of U.S. President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act is still having ripple effects and unforeseen consequences as the IRA compels Brussels to adapt. This trend can be seen in the significant changes in July to the last draft of the new European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). One of the major changes made by the EU Commission to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group’s (EFRAG) proposals was to align the ESRS standards with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to ensure international interoperability. The die is close to being cast in the European battle over accounting standards–in favor of the ISSB’s softer financial philosophy.

The prospect that truly sustainable finance may be unable to preserve itself looms large over 2024. The idea of a comprehensive fair transition of the economy seems to be morphing into a niche approach to sustainable finance.

Poorly devised communications around ESG investing have contributed to weakening the movement toward a responsible and forward-looking economy. Faced with angry farmer protests, the EU has given up on its goal of halving pesticide use by 2040. Financially illiterate environmental activism is also having a chilling effect on companies. For example, a parliamentary inquiry in France is scrutinizing the environmental commitments of energy giant TotalEnergies. With accusations of “greenhushing,” “greenwashing,” and “woke capitalism,” the three letters “ESG” have become synonymous with backlash.

The rhetoric is simple if one wishes to undermine economic decisions that encourage ethical behavioras a primary concern. It plays upon the fears of Western democratic public opinion amidst growing disquiet in the face of deepening inequality and the fragmentation of the world. Essentially, this rhetoric benefits from the misfortunes of the population. For example, in France and Germany, the far right is cynically capitalizing on the anger of the farmers who have to contend with European Green Deal policies as well as the increase in energy prices. All of this is happening because farmers are being caught up in the middle of the geopolitical reality of an exporting industry with a short-term high exposure to the green transition.

In the long term, however, Europe’s companies, economy, and people will be the ones paying a high price for the policies of cynicism that have no set agendas or tangible projects for the future.

Nevertheless, the green breeze is still blowing gently across Europe. At Davos, French President Emmanuel Macron used his trump card: “at the same time.” It’s a reference to the Paris Agreement formula, “for people and planet,” and the IRA’s philosophy. Indeed, a united Europe can achieve growth and decarbonization “at the same time.” By providing renewed hope for the middle classes and with the help of a sustainability agenda that encourages investments in Europe, Brussels can bolster its mandate.

As the hustle and bustle of the upcoming U.S. elections continues to captivate and sway the opinions of European political leaders, companies in Europe that have always remained neutral in the past, following the customs of the Old Continent, might have to change their way of doing business. They must be more vocal–or 2024 may be the year in which they find themselves trapped by the politics of cynicism.

Camille Fumard is a special advisor on strategic affairs to C-suite executives atEuropean boutique communications agency JIN and theauthorof a book on leadership in the XXIst century.

More must-readcommentarypublished byFortune:

  • Here’show the U.S., Europe, and China are faringin the post-pandemic race for economic growth
  • Working fathers are the new target of microaggressions–and they are worried they could be getting‘daddy tracked’
  • Travis Kelce’s Super Bowl behavior is emblematic ofthe ‘rise of the jerk’
  • The anti-DEI movement has gonefrom fringe to mainstream. Here’s what that means for corporate America

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs ofFortune.

The anti-ESG backlash is not just an American phenomenon as Europe waters down its sustainability agenda (2024)

FAQs

What is anti-ESG backlash? ›

Negative rhetoric surrounding ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) has intensified into a rapidly escalating backlash in 2024. Vocal critics, who say ESG principles have no bearing on business performance, have dubbed it “woke capitalism,” warning of “ESG cartels” advancing a “secret liberal political agenda.”

Why is ESG more popular in Europe? ›

Across Europe's financial services sector there are 20 rules and 25 voluntary guidelines pertaining to ESG, compared to just two rules and five voluntary guidelines in the United States, according to ESG Book. There is also more investor demand for ESG in Europe, driven by public pension funds.

What is the ESG controversy? ›

An ESG controversy case is defined as either an event or an ongoing situation in which company operations and/or products allegedly have a negative environmental, social and/or governance impact.

What is the ESG policy in the US? ›

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and non-financial reporting regulations in the United States are evolving as stakeholders increasingly demand transparency and accountability from companies regarding their impact on the environment, society, and corporate governance.

Why is ESG a risk? ›

ESG Risks are those arising from Environmental, Social and Governance factors that a company must address and manage. These risks are a combination of threats and opportunities that can have a significant impact on an organisation's reputation and financial performance.

Is ESG greenwashing? ›

Greenwashing lawsuits have continued to gain steam as companies have increased their voluntary disclosures concerning ESG-related commitments to satisfy investor and consumer demands. Decarbonization and net zero commitments are at the forefront of this risk and look to remain a hot button topic.

Which country is best for ESG? ›

As of Autumn 2021, the Scandinavian countries continued to sustain their global sustainability leadership. With an ESG score of 8.91, Finland tops the current ranking for the first time, ahead of its Nordic neighbours Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Iceland.

Which industry is most affected by ESG? ›

Manufacturing is one of the industries with the greatest impact on the environment, society, and governance. Significant ESG concerns threaten its long-term viability and competitiveness.

Is ESG mandatory in Europe? ›

For companies with significant business in Europe, regardless of where they are based, the era of mandatory environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure has officially arrived.

What is the biggest ESG scandal? ›

Volkswagen emissions scandal

The result was that in reality these cars were emitting nitrogen oxide pollutants up to 40 times above the limit in the US. The company later admitted to cheating on emissions tests, stating that 11 million cars were fitted with this device worldwide.

Who is behind anti-ESG? ›

That brings us back to the article by Times reporter Kenneth Vogel. He reveals that the man behind the anti-ESG curtain is a prominent conservative activist named Leonard Leo, who oversees “an opaque, sprawling network” of conservative initiatives and front organizations funded through anonymous “dark money” donations.

Why do people oppose ESG? ›

“They may also argue that considering ESG factors could conflict with a fiduciary's duty to act in the best financial interests of plan participants. Some opponents also believe that ESG investing is politically motivated and could lead to biased investment decisions.”

How many states ban ESG? ›

By the Numbers: Adopted ESG-Related Legislation:

18 states that have adopted “anti-ESG” legislation. 14 states that adopted “anti-ESG” legislation in the 2023 legislative session. 4 states that have adopted “pro-ESG” legislation. 1 state that adopted “pro-ESG” law in 2023.

What is Biden ESG rules? ›

The Biden administration's new rule—which enables and encourages retirement fiduciaries to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors—will allow activist investors to funnel retirees' savings into progressive, left-wing causes.

Will ESG become mandatory? ›

There is currently no federal mandate for ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting in the United States. However, there are various initiatives and regulations that require companies to disclose certain ESG information.

What does anti-ESG mean? ›

The term anti-ESG investing is somewhat subjective. For some proponents, anti-ESG investing is about maximizing profits without regard to a company's governance factors or its impact on society and the planet. These investors often argue that a company should be evaluated solely on the basis of financial performance.

What does ESG stand for? ›

ESG stands for Environmental, Social and Governance. This is often called sustainability. In a business context, sustainability is about the company's business model, i.e. how its products and services contribute to sustainable development.

What is the ESG issue? ›

Environmental, social and governance issues.

How to deal with ESG backlash? ›

By focusing on business strategy, refining terminology, engaging policy makers, assisting investors, and maintaining perspective, companies can turn ESG backlash into advantage and drive long-term value.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arielle Torp

Last Updated:

Views: 5332

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arielle Torp

Birthday: 1997-09-20

Address: 87313 Erdman Vista, North Dustinborough, WA 37563

Phone: +97216742823598

Job: Central Technology Officer

Hobby: Taekwondo, Macrame, Foreign language learning, Kite flying, Cooking, Skiing, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Arielle Torp, I am a comfortable, kind, zealous, lovely, jolly, colorful, adventurous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.