The problem with ESG scores (2024)

Important Information

This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should consider, with the assistance of a financial advisor, your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation.

We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. To the extent this material contains any measurements or data related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, these measurements or data are estimates based on information sourced by the relevant investment team from third parties including portfolio companies and such information may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circ*mstances change.

To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only. This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Investors.

To the extent this material contains any ESG related commitments or targets, such commitments or targets are current as at the date of publication and have been formulated by the relevant investment team in accordance with either internally developed proprietary frameworks or are otherwise based on the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) Paris Aligned Investment Initiative framework. The commitments and targets are based on information and representations made to the relevant investment teams by portfolio companies (which may ultimately prove not be accurate), together with assumptions made by the relevant investment team in relation to future matters such as government policy implementation in ESG and other climate-related areas, enhanced future technology and the actions of portfolio companies (all of which are subject to change over time). As such, achievement of these commitments and targets depend on the ongoing accuracy of such information and representations as well as the realisation of such future matters. Any commitments and targets set out in this material are continuously reviewed by the relevant investment teams and subject to change without notice.

About First Sentier Investors

References to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to First Sentier Investors, a global asset management business which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Certain of our investment teams operate under the trading names FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners, all of which are part of the First Sentier Investors group.

We communicate and conduct business through different legal entities in different locations. This material is communicated in:

  • Australia and New Zealand by First Sentier Investors (Australia) IM Ltd, authorised and regulated in Australia by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (AFSL 289017; ABN 89 114 194311)
  • European Economic Area by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited, authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI reg no. C182306; reg office 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland; reg company no. 629188)
  • Hong Kong by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong. First Sentier Investors, FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, RQI Investors and Igneo Infrastructure Partners are the business names of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited.
  • Singapore by First Sentier Investors (Singapore) (reg company no. 196900420D) and this advertisem*nt or material has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. First Sentier Investors (registration number 53236800B), FSSA Investment Managers (registration number 53314080C), Stewart Investors (registration number 53310114W), RQI Investors (registration number 53472532E) and Igneo Infrastructure Partners (registration number 53447928J) are the business divisions of First Sentier Investors (Singapore).
  • Japan by First Sentier Investors (Japan) Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Service Agency (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Registered Financial Institutions) No.2611)
  • United Kingdom by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (reg. no. 2294743; reg office Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7EB)
  • United States by First Sentier Investors (US) LLC, authorised and regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (RIA 801-93167)
  • other jurisdictions, where this document may lawfully be issued, by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited, authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ref no. 122512; Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB; Company no. SC079063).

To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.

© First Sentier Investors Group

The problem with ESG scores (2024)

FAQs

The problem with ESG scores? ›

ESG has come under fire for being overly broad and underperforming as a predictive measure of robust financial returns. Many are calling out the prevalence of greenwashing, where companies exaggerate the environmental impact of their actions.

What is the problem with ESG scores? ›

Lack of quality data is traditionally identified as the main barrier to the objectivity of ESG ratings. Agencies tend to rely on self-disclosures from the rated companies or obtain data from third-party sources that is no more reliable than what firms provide themselves.

What are the criticism of ESG ratings? ›

Probably the biggest criticism of the ESG rating agencies is the fact that they sometimes come to completely different assessments of one and the same company. This is also proven by the study authors. According to this, the correlation between two ratings for a company varies between 0.71 and 0.38.

What is the problem with ESG reporting? ›

Tracking and collecting data across these diverse dimensions can be complex and resource-intensive. In addition, relevant ESG data might be hard to come by: it may be proprietary, confidential, or difficult to access, particularly when it comes to supply chain information or indirect environmental and social impacts.

What are the arguments against ESG reporting? ›

Market Distortion. Another key argument against ESG investing is its potential to distort market mechanisms and investment priorities. By favoring companies that meet specific ESG criteria, investors might inadvertently inflate the value of these companies, creating bubbles in "green" or "sustainable" sectors.

What is the controversy with ESG? ›

One of the biggest criticisms of ESG is that it perpetuates what it was partly designed to stop – greenwashing.

Who controls the ESG score? ›

Several third-party providers calculate ESG scores — including agencies and research and analysis firms — that evaluate companies on ESG performance. These organizations determine independent ESG scores that inform investment decisions and comparisons against peers.

What are the disadvantages of ESG? ›

However, there are also some cons to ESG investing. First, ESG funds may carry higher-than-average expense ratios. This is because ESG investing requires more research and due diligence, which can be costly. Second, ESG investing can be subjective.

What can go wrong in ESG? ›

Failing to make ESG part of the company culture

If ESG efforts are not overly expressed as part of the company's values and with clear goals that can be measured, they can cause disruptions and loss of productivity.

What are ESG biggest issues? ›

The 5 biggest ESG challenges for businesses and manufacturers globally are: climate change, supply chain sustainability, social impact, data privacy and cybersecurity, and governance and ethics.

Why does ESG not work? ›

One of the main challenges is that ESG scoring methodologies tend to focus on how well companies manage their internal processes, rather than the real-world impacts of their products and services.

What is replacing ESG? ›

'ESG' originated as a way to demonstrate compliance however it was often then used interchangeably, and use of the term was replaced with 'sustainability'. But it's making a resurgence – 'ESG' is back.

What are the 23 ESG controversy topics? ›

ESG controversies score consists of 23 ESG controversy topics, including anti-competition, business ethics, intellectual property, tax fraud privacy, environmental issues, diversity & opportunity, etc. The default value of all controversy measures is 0, meaning companies with no controversies will get a score of 100%.

What are the negative effects of ESG? ›

The consequences are that investors accounts suffer, and resources and capital are directed away from the oil and gas industry. The average American's retirement account, when invested with ESG criteria in mind, is being used to further a political agenda, not bring about the best return and savings for the client.

What is the disadvantage of ESG reporting? ›

CONS OF ESG:

Lack of standardization: There is no universal set of ESG criteria, which can make it difficult for investors to compare companies and make informed investment decisions.

What are the risks of ESG? ›

Types of ESG Risks

Examples include causing water contamination, air pollution, or improper waste disposal. Social risks. These risks are associated with how an organization or government treats its employees, stakeholders, and the communities they serve.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Roderick King

Last Updated:

Views: 6083

Rating: 4 / 5 (51 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Roderick King

Birthday: 1997-10-09

Address: 3782 Madge Knoll, East Dudley, MA 63913

Phone: +2521695290067

Job: Customer Sales Coordinator

Hobby: Gunsmithing, Embroidery, Parkour, Kitesurfing, Rock climbing, Sand art, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Roderick King, I am a cute, splendid, excited, perfect, gentle, funny, vivacious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.