Pros and Cons of the 50/30/20 Budgeting Rule (2024)

FAQs

Pros and Cons of the 50/30/20 Budgeting Rule? ›

Some Experts Say the 50/30/20 Is Not a Good Rule at All. “This budget is restrictive and does not take into consideration your values, lifestyle and money goals. For example, 50% for needs is not enough for those in high-cost-of-living areas.

Some Experts Say the 50/30/20 Is Not a Good Rule at All. “This budget is restrictive and does not take into consideration your values, lifestyle and money goals. For example, 50% for needs is not enough for those in high-cost-of-living areas.

Disadvantages of the 50/30/20 Budget

Many people find it hard to allocate 20% of their income toward savings. If you live in a large metropolitan area with a high cost of living, it may be difficult or impossible to include all your needs with only 50% of your income.

In some major cities, more than 60% of income goes to rent. Individuals have it even harder, with rents accounting for more than 70% to upwards of 100% of their income in some instances. With the basics chewing up such a large proportion of after-tax income, your savings strategy may not match the 50/30/20 rule.

It slows your progress when you have multiple savings goals. When you have multiple savings goals you're working on simultaneously, it's going to take you longer to save for each of them. That's true of any budget, but it's a more significant problem if you're serious about adhering to the 50/30/20 model.

The 50/30/20 rule can be a good budgeting method for some, but it may not work for your unique monthly expenses. Depending on your income and where you live, earmarking 50% of your income for your needs may not be enough.

The basic concept behind the 50/30/20 rule works for just about anyone. But depending on your income and debt load, you may need to adjust the exact breakdown of your expenses. For example, a low-income household may need to spend more than 50% of their after-tax pay on needs.

But amid ongoing inflation, the 50/30/20 method no longer feels feasible for families who say they're struggling to make ends meet. Financial experts agree — and some say it may be time to adjust the percentages accordingly, to 60/30/10.

The Bottom Line

The 50-30-20 rule provides individuals with a plan for how to manage their after-tax income. If they find that their expenditures on wants are more than 30%, for example, they can find ways to reduce those expenses and direct funds to more important areas, such as emergency money and retirement.

Zero-based budgeting differs from traditional budgeting in that the companies using it create a budget for each new period. The benefits can include lower costs by keeping old and new expenses in check. Potential disadvantages are that it can reward short-term thinking and be resource-intensive.

What's better than the 50/30/20 rule? ›

The 60/30/10 budgeting method says you should put 60% of your monthly income toward your needs, 30% towards your wants and 10% towards your savings. It's trending as an alternative to the longer-standing 50/30/20 method.

Use our 50/30/20 budget calculator to estimate how you might divide your monthly income into needs, wants and savings. This will give you a big-picture view of your finances. The most important number is the smallest: the 20% dedicated to savings.

50% of your net income should go towards living expenses and essentials (Needs), 20% of your net income should go towards debt reduction and savings (Debt Reduction and Savings), and 30% of your net income should go towards discretionary spending (Wants).

Important reminder: The 50/30/20 budget rule only considers your take-home pay for the month, so anything automatically deducted from your paycheck — like your work health insurance premium or 401k retirement contribution — doesn't count in the equation.

Going over budget can disrupt your finances. For instance, it might cause you to pile up more debt. That, in turn, could lead to a lower credit score.